County Council Election February 1890
4 February 1890
·
general
Electorate: 126 (107 men, 19 women) · Turnout: 86 (68.3%)
Electorate: 50 (23 men, 27 women)
Electorate: 103 (87 men, 16 women)
Electorate: 101 (81 men, 20 women) · Turnout: 14 (13.9%)
Electorate: 76 (60 men, 18 women)
Electorate: 73 (66 men, 7 women)
Electorate: 139 (122 men, 17 women) · Turnout: 87 (62.3%)
Electorate: 147 (125 men, 22 women)
Electorate: 348 (204 men, 140 women)
Electorate: 426 (295 men, 131 women)
Electorate: 122 (69 men, 53 women)
Electorate: 83 (77 men, 6 women) · Turnout: 16 (19.7%)
Electorate: 199 (169 men, 30 women) · Turnout: 118 (59.3%)
Electorate: 138 (117 men, 21 women)
Electorate: 204 (157 men, 47 women) · Turnout: 25 (12.3%)
Electorate: 111 (82 men, 29 women) · Turnout: 46
Electorate: 202 (174 men, 28 women) · Turnout: 122 (60.4%)
Electorate: 264 (183 men, 81 women) · Turnout: 180 (68.2%)
Electorate: 147 (112 men, 35 women) · Turnout: 113 (76.9%)
Electorate: 162 (138 men, 24 women)
Electorate: 68 (50 men, 18 women)
No candidate was nominated for the seat, and after two failed attempts at filling the vanancy, the council resolved to have no representative for the area.
Electorate: 82 (77 men, 5 women) · Turnout: 14 (17.1%)
Electorate: 126 (86 men, 30 women) · Turnout: 66 (52.9%)
Electorate: 62 (55 men, 7 women)
Electorate: 64 (54 men, 10 women)